?? ??????? ?????????, ????????, ??????? ?????????? ?? ???? ?????? – ?????
????????? ?? ?????? ??????? ??? ???????? ???. ????? ?. ?????
?? ???????? ????
Babalik daw ang NCAP – No Contact Apprehension Program – sa Abril.
But even if judicial roadblocks are lifted, the No Contact Apprehension Program should not be resumed until broad consultations, whose end is to cure it of its weaknesses, are held.
Parang sa lansangan lang, “Stop, Look, Listen” is the most prudent approach.
The national government must look under NCAP’s hood and tweak and treat the program of its defects. Para kung ibabalik man, walang malawakang reklamo na ang hulicam ay parang hulidap.
Mainam siguro kung iutos ng Malacanang ang isang pag-aaral na ang layunin ay bumalangkas ng isang national policy guidelines sa programang ito. Crowdsource the ideas, canvass the best practices, and cure it of its weaknesses.
At kapag nabuo, ipatupad by way of legislation. Kung pwede idaan sa pamamagitan ng E.O. ni Pangulong BBM, bakit hindi?
The objective is to have a uniform rule that binds the entire country.
As NCAP is getting viral, spreading to other LGUs, the rules must be made clear, so there will be benchmarks as to fines imposed, as well as the limits of ROI of private contractors.
Kung ang kalsada may lanes at speed limits, ganun din sa NCAP dapat. Hindi pwede ang freewheeling.
Isang mahalaga sa konsultasyon ay maipakita ang mga konkretong halimbawa ng violations.
Katiting at segundo na stepping on the pedestrian lane lang ba, libo-libo na ang multa base sa isang snapshot ng pangyayari?
Ilang tao ba ang rerepaso ng footage? Taong gobyerno ba sila? Or private contractors? If they are, then what is the legal basis for nongovernment men to be empowered to inflict fines on citizens?
In principle, I agree that CCTVs could be a tool to enhance traffic enforcement, to impose rules — that should be the only motivation, and never to raise revenues.
